I am looking for minimum and maximum values for integers in python. For eg., in Java, we have
Integer.MAX_VALUE. Is there something like this in python?
In Python 3, this question doesn’t apply. The plain
int type is unbounded.
However, you might actually be looking for information about the current interpreter’s word size, which will be the same as the machine’s word size in most cases. That information is still available in Python 3 as
sys.maxsize, which is the maximum value representable by a signed word. Equivalently, it’s the size of the largest possible list or in-memory sequence.
Generally, the maximum value representable by an unsigned word will be
sys.maxsize * 2 + 1, and the number of bits in a word will be
math.log2(sys.maxsize * 2 + 2). See this answer for more information.
In Python 2, the maximum value for plain
int values is available as
>>> sys.maxint 9223372036854775807
You can calculate the minimum value with
-sys.maxint - 1 as shown here.
Python seamlessly switches from plain to long integers once you exceed this value. So most of the time, you won’t need to know it.
If you just need a number that’s bigger than all others, you can use
in similar fashion, a number smaller than all others:
This works in both python 2 and 3.
sys.maxint constant has been removed from Python 3.0 onward, instead use
- PEP 237: Essentially, long renamed to int. That is, there is only one built-in integral type, named int; but it behaves mostly like the old long type.
- PEP 238: An expression like 1/2 returns a float. Use 1//2 to get the truncating behavior. (The latter syntax has existed for years, at least since Python 2.2.)
- The sys.maxint constant was removed, since there is no longer a limit to the value of integers. However, sys.maxsize can be used as an integer larger than any practical list or string index. It conforms to the implementation’s “natural” integer size and is typically the same as sys.maxint in previous releases on the same platform (assuming the same build options).
- The repr() of a long integer doesn’t include the trailing L anymore, so code that unconditionally strips that character will chop off the last digit instead. (Use str() instead.)
- Octal literals are no longer of the form 0720; use 0o720 instead.
In Python integers will automatically switch from a fixed-size
int representation into a variable width
long representation once you pass the value
sys.maxint, which is either 231 – 1 or 263 – 1 depending on your platform. Notice the
L that gets appended here:
>>> 9223372036854775807 9223372036854775807 >>> 9223372036854775808 9223372036854775808L
From the Python manual:
Numbers are created by numeric literals or as the result of built-in functions and operators. Unadorned integer literals (including binary, hex, and octal numbers) yield plain integers unless the value they denote is too large to be represented as a plain integer, in which case they yield a long integer. Integer literals with an
'l'suffix yield long integers (
'L'is preferred because
1llooks too much like eleven!).
Python tries very hard to pretend its integers are mathematical integers and are unbounded. It can, for instance, calculate a googol with ease:
>>> 10**100 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000L
For Python 3, it is
import sys max = sys.maxsize min = -sys.maxsize - 1
You may use ‘inf’ like this:
import math bool_true = 0 < math.inf bool_false = 0 < -math.inf
If you want the max for array or list indices (equivalent to
size_t in C/C++), you can use numpy:
This is same as
sys.maxsize however advantage is that you don’t need import sys just for this.
If you want max for native int on the machine:
You can look at other available types in doc.
For floats you can also use
I rely heavily on commands like this.
python -c 'import sys; print(sys.maxsize)'
Max int returned: 9223372036854775807
For more references for ‘sys’ you should access
sys.maxsize is not the actually the maximum integer value which is supported. You can double maxsize and multiply it by itself and it stays a valid and correct value.
However, if you try
sys.maxsize ** sys.maxsize, it will hang your machine for a significant amount of time. As many have pointed out, the byte and bit size does not seem to be relevant because it practically doesn’t exist. I guess python just happily expands it’s integers when it needs more memory space. So in general there is no limit.
Now, if you’re talking about packing or storing integers in a safe way where they can later be retrieved with integrity then of course that is relevant. I’m really not sure about packing but I know python’s
pickle module handles those things well. String representations obviously have no practical limit.
So really, the bottom line is: what is your applications limit? What does it require for numeric data? Use that limit instead of python’s fairly nonexistent integer limit.