Error in,y,offset = offset, singular.ok,…) 0 non-NA cases with boxcox formula

I am trying to run a boxcox transformation with the following code:

urban1 <- subset(ski,urban <= 4,na.rm=TRUE)
ski$gender <- as.numeric((as.character(ski$gender)),na.rm=TRUE)
urban1 <- as.numeric((as.character(urban1)))
x <- (ski$gender*urban1)
y <- ski$EPSI.
bc <- boxcox(y ~ x) 
(trans <- bc$x[which.max(bc$y)]) 
model3 <- lm(y ~ x) 
model3new <- lm(y^trans ~ x)
ski$EPSI. <- ski$EPSI. + 1

But I keep getting this error:

Error in,y,offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, …) : 0 (non-NA) cases Calls: … eval -> eval -> boxcar -> boxcar.formula -> lm -> Execution halted

Thanks in advance!

2 Answers

The error message,y,offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, …) : 0 (non-NA) cases

is generated by the lm(y ~ x) command when variables x or y (or both) have only NAs.
Here is an example:

n <- 10
x <- rnorm(n,1)
y <- rep(NA,n)
lm(y ~ x)

Error in, y, offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, ...) : 
  0 (non-NA) cases

In your code I suggest to test (just before your lm commands) if one of your variables has all NAs using:


In my example:

[1] TRUE

The error can be triggered by NA’s in your data or a bad transformation

#From the mtcars dataset
mpg.reg3 <- lm(mpg ~ cylinders + displacement + horsepower + weight + acceleration + year + origin, data=Auto, na.action=na.exclude)

Notice the na.action= argument. Setting this to na.exclude will allow the lm function to ignore NA’s in your data. Another option is na.omit which acts in a slightly different manner.

The other problem may be a bad transformation of your data- double check your interaction terms and manipulations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *